Further Discussion Partisan Cycles
Other empirical studies of RPT report more mixed results. Sheffrin (1989), for example,
finds US monetary cycles, but not significantly consistent with RPT in the USA or
elsewhere. Using over 100 years of American data, Klein (1996) finds political events
associated with ends of slumps and booms, consistent with RPT, although Klein’s
study does not directly test RPT. Carlsen (1998, 1999) and Carlsen and Pedersen
(1999) investigate nominal rigidities and electoral surprises, which together should
produce RPT cycles, and compares measures reflecting their combination with those
analogously derived fromHibbsian partisan theoryThe results are weakly positive for
US inflation cycles, supporting both versions of partisan theory, negative for US real
outcomes, and mixed elsewhere; Carlsen and Pedersen (1999) find clear RPT support
in the UK, some RPT support in Canada and Australia, classical partisan-theory
support in the USA, and inconclusive findings in Sweden and Germany. Finally, Faust
and Irons (1999) find evidence to support Alesina and colleagues’ proposition that
the first two years of new administrations exhibit the distinctive real outcomes RPT
predicts (right-worse; left-better) but also that little of this distinctiveness can be
attributed to partisan monetary policies, echoing some of the above discussion.
Others stress more theoretical limitations. Following Rogoff (1988), Garfinkel and
Glazer (1994) ask whether US bargainers, in order to avoid election surprises that
would alter the real terms of nominal contracts, would simply defer contracts to postelection,
finding that some contracts do exhibit significant post-electoral kyphosis.
This suggests that bargainers do perceive electoral-economic uncertainty sufficient to
warrant altering their contracting behavior, supporting RPT’s theoretical basis, but
that very alteration in behavior mutes any monetary-surprise-induced real cycles,
weakening RPT’s explanation for partisan real-outcome cycles. Ellis and Thoma
(1991) emphasize instead that, because election timing in most parliamentary systems
is endogenous, partisan surprises there are more continuous and irregular,
and likely somewhat smaller, than in exogenous election timing systems. Ellis and
Thoma (1995) find evidence of current account, real exchange rate, and terms of trade
cycles supporting hypotheses derived from their model reflecting this consideration. Heckelman (2001), relatedly, models rational economic agents facing uncertainty
regarding election timing and election winners.
Real effects here depend on partisanship
in current and previous periods, time since the last election, and incumbent
popularity. In this RE model, unlike in Alesina’s RPT, lefts/rights spur/dampen real
output throughout their term, and these real effects rise rather than diminish over the
term. Drazen (2001), finally, questions RPT’s emphasis on monetary policy, giving an
active-fiscal/passive-monetary RE model that predicts political-economic cycles more
consistent with the full policy and outcome evidentiary pattern described above..
Macroeconomic voting divides naturally into two main views defined by voters’ time
horizons: prospective and retrospective. In the prospective view, the expected future
relative performance of contestants for office is all that matters. Prospective valuation
is akin to the pricing of financial ass...
more »
International monetary regimes tend toward one of two ideal types. The first is a
fixed rate system, in which currencies are tied to each other at publicly announced
rates. Some fixed rate systems involve a common link to a commodity such as gold
or silver; others peg to a national currency such as...
more »
Political factors within nations give rise to two basic types of pressures for—or
against—coordination and cooperation in the international arena. On the one hand,
exchange rate policies involve trade-offs with domestic distributional implications.
International coordination or cooperation may n...
more »
In a seminal article, Przeworski and Wallerstein (1982) give a simple answer to the
question of why the poor don’t soak the rich. Any attempt at radical redistribution, or
socialism, they argue, would be met by massive disinvestment and possibly violence
by the upper classes. So even if the poor w...
more »
Median voter models are very simple to use, but as the Robin Hood paradox suggests,
they do not provide much leverage on explaining the observed variance in
redistributive politics. Power resources theory points to one potential source of such
variation that has been subject to much research: govern...
more »